#offtopic FLOORS IN THE BRAIN: INTERLAMINAR ASTROGLIAL CELLS AS INTELLECTUAL ELEVETORS WITHIN THE COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS OF THE HUMAN NEOCORTEX

 Articolo del fondatore del Partito, Salvatore Spadaro, qui pubblicato in maniera provvisoria  in attesa di pubblicazione ufficiale su giornale accademico. 

Progetto pubblico su OSF:  https://osf.io/apwyc/overview

Abstract: Recent scientific investigations on astroglial cells, in particular interlaminar astrocytes, have been reviewed; the hypothesis of human pan-cortical interlaminar astrocytes, reaching the layer VI of neocortex, is presented. In this context, A reform of the cognitive exagon is proposed, including the human-specific role of glia in higher cognitive-intellectual abilities.  The necessity of expansion of the cognitive approach in glia scientific investigations is affirmed.

 

Introduction

For more than a century, the extraordinary computational capacity, cognitive and higher-order reasoning features of the human neocortex have been viewed almost exclusively through a neuron-centric lens. Traditional neuroscience models have mapped complex cognition, ranging from abstract thought to temporal processing, primarily as an emergent property of intricate neuronal networks and synaptic circuits. However, comparative evolutionary studies demonstrate that the substantial expansion and structural complexification of the human brain cannot be attributed to neuronal scaling alone. Instead, human brain evolution is underscored by profound anatomical, molecular, and functional adaptations within the glial lineage, particularly among astrocytes.

Long dismissed as passive metabolic support cells, glia, in particular astroglia (Santello et al., 2019) and microglia (Morris et al.,2013), are now recognized as active, dynamic partners in information processing. In the human neocortex, the astrocytic contribution reaches its evolutionary zenith. Human protoplasmic astrocytes, occupying distinct, local gray matter domains, exhibit massive volumetric expansion, contacting hundreds of thousands to millions of synapses and propagating intercellular calcium signals at speeds vastly outstripping those of standard murine models. Concurrently, the human neocortex features specialized primate-specific populations, most notably interlaminar astrocytes (Munger et al.,2022). Confined to layer I, these unique cells project exceptionally long, cable-like processes deep into the cortical mantle, positioning them to coordinate translaminar signaling and bridge superficial inputs with deep-layer networks.

Together, the local homeostatic integration provided by protoplasmic astrocytes and the long-range architectural coordination driven by interlaminar astrocytes suggest a sophisticated, multi-tiered glial framework supporting human cognition (Matyash et al.,2010;Cinquina et al.,2025). Despite these insights, how these distinct human astrocytic morphotypes specifically shape neocortical microcircuits and contribute to higher-order processing remains a critical frontier.

 In this review, we examine the structural specializations, physiological properties, and cognitive roles of human interlaminar and protoplasmic astrocytes, proposing that human intelligence is inextricably linked to the evolutionary co-adaptation of glia and neurons.

 

Neocortical astrocytes as core parts for human metacognition

The cognitive contributions of protoplasmic and interlaminar astrocytes (ILAs) become especially clear when contrasted with the principles of neuronal activity. While neurons operate via rapid, point-to-point electrical signaling, utilizing microsecond-scale action potentials to transmit discrete digital-like packets of information across specific synaptic clefts, astrocytes rely on slow, non-electrical, and broadcast-style chemical signaling ( Fields et al.,2006; Stogsdill et al.,2023). Through intracellular calcium waves, gap-junctional syncytia, and the release of gliotransmitters (such as glutamate, D-serine, and ATP), astroglia function over seconds to minutes and, in some cases, also hours  modulating the operational environment rather than carrying raw data.

Within layers II through V, protoplasmic astrocytes leverage this slow chemical machinery to regulate metaplasticity: the shifting baseline capacity of synapses to undergo subsequent long-term potentiation (LTP) or depression (LTD). Unlike neurons, which fire in response to immediate electrical thresholds, protoplasmic astrocytes integrate local synaptic history over extended temporal windows by clearing neurotransmitters and buffering ions (Jones et al.2024; Tyurikova,2024). By dynamically adjusting local chemical thresholds, they dictate how future plastic changes occur, acting as metabolic and homeostatic regulators that govern micro-circuit adaptability.

In contrast, human ILAs scale this slow, modulatory capacity to a macro-structural level to influence metacognition. While neuronal columns process sensory and motor information via rapid, serial electrical relays, ILAs are anchored at the pia mater surface in Layer I, continuously sampling cerebrospinal fluid cues and global neuromodulatory showers. Rather than participating in local, wire-like electrical circuits, the ILA network utilizes widespread chemical diffusion and translaminar coupling to provide a whole-column supervisory state (Krencik et al.,2017; Fourrier et al.2019). By bridging superficial monitoring with deep infragranular output layers via slow calcium- and metabolic-based signaling (Volterra et al.,2014), ILAs supply the global contextual background required for executive control, proving that higher-order human cognition relies on a cooperative interplay between fast electrical computation and slow astroglial modulation.

Focusing on interlaminar astrocytes (ILAs) that extend 2 to 3 distinct projections shifts the model from a single-file line of communication to a divergent, multi-branched broadcasting system.

In human histology, typical ILAs have their somas in Layer I and send out long, tortuous processes (frequently 1 to 2, but occasionally 2 to 3 major primary branches) that radiate down into the cortex (Colombo et al.,2004). When a single ILA projects 2 or 3 separate fibers downward, it stops being a simple point-to-point "cable" and becomes a macro-divergent broadcasting hub.

Rather than acting as isolated, single-wire conduits, a specialized subset of human interlaminar astrocytes featuring 2 to 3 primary translaminar projections introduces a powerful computational capability: fan-out divergence.

• Broadcasting Across Functional Columns: If a single ILA in Layer I extends multiple independent processes downward, it can simultaneously interface with multiple distinct cortical columns or different micro-circuits within the same vertical domain. A single chemical or metacognitive signal sampled from the cerebrospinal fluid at the pial surface can thus be fanned out and broadcast concurrently to several different depths or adjacent functional minicolumns.
• Coordinating Multi-Tiered Synchrony: While protoplasmic astrocytes manage local neighborhood homeostasis, an ILA with 2 to 3 branching extensions creates a synchronized chemical link across disparate layers (e.g., sending simultaneous modulatory influences to layers II/III associative zones and layers V/VI deep output hubs). This multi-process architecture allows a single supervisory unit in the "control room" to coordinate parallel processing streams without losing global cohesion.

Our perspective is that the unique evolutionary elaboration of human interlaminar astrocytes (ILAs), particularly those extending two to three distinct, ultra-long projections, may provide a critical structural substrate for higher-order human cognition, including metacognition and conscious state regulation. While traditional models of consciousness rely exclusively on complex, serial neuronal loops, they often struggle to explain how unified background states and whole-column modulation are maintained across a massively expanded human neocortex. By anchoring their somas at the pial glia limitans within Layer I (Hasel et al.,2025) and fanning out multiple independent processes deep into infragranular layers, these specialized ILAs act as macro-divergent broadcasting hubs. Through slow, non-electrical chemical signaling, gap-junctional coupling, and calcium wave propagation (Semyanov,2020), a single ILA can simultaneously coordinate metabolic and modulatory states across multiple functional minicolumns and cortical depths. We hypothesize that this vertical, multi-branched glial architecture serves as an essential administrative bridge, linking superficial cerebrospinal fluid monitoring and metacognitive oversight directly to deep motor and executive output networks, thereby offering a novel, non-neuronal dimension to the structural framework of human consciousness.

 

The development of vertical complexity of interlaminar astrocytes  in evolution

In the 1970s and 1980s, Pasko Rakic ( 1978; 1981) demonstrated that embryonic radial glial cells (RGs) act as a structural scaffold spanning the entire width of the developing neural tube, guiding postmitotic neurons via glia-guided locomotion to form the six-layered neocortex (the radial unit hypothesis). Traditionally, Rakic and his contemporaries posited that once neurogenesis ceases, these transient embryonic radial glia undergo a morphological transformation, losing their bipolar shape and differentiating into conventional parenchymal astrocytes. In higher primates and humans, this transformation is far more elaborate. Instead of simple stellate astrocytes, subsets of radial glia precursors give rise to highly specialized, human-enriched primate phenotypes, in particular, interlaminar astrocytes (Mosti et al.,2025). Unique to primates (and vastly expanded in humans), interlaminar astrocytes reside primarily in superficial cortical layers (Layer I). They feature long, unbranched and branched processes (interlaminar fibers) that plunge deep into the cortical gray matter, sometimes spanning across multiple layers. Lineage tracing and marker expression studies (Colombo,2017) show that ILAs have a prenatal origin directly tied to the radial glial lineage. They emerge from progenitors expressing classic stem/radial markers (like Pax6, Sox2 and Nestin).

As the human fetal cortex expands, particularly with the massive evolutionary scaling of the supragranular layers, the continuous radial glial scaffold breaks down into discontinuous or truncated structures. Surviving elements or daughter cells of this lineage undergo a distinct maturation program rather than simply dissolving or becoming protoplasmic astrocytes. ILAs are specified early, during fetal development, born from the proliferative zones that once drove human cortical expansion. While their birth is prenatal, their structural complexity explodes postnatally (Falcone et al.,2021). Their characteristic ultra-long fibers and specialized terminal structures (such as endfeet anchoring around blood vessels or the pial surface) mature alongside human cognitive development and circuit refinement. We propose that human ILAs represent the most faithful structural and molecular descendants or "sons" of the embryonic radial glial pool. Unlike parenchymal astrocytes that adopt a localized, bushy morphology, ILAs retain molecular vestiges of their radial heritage, including the persistent expression of neural progenitor markers such as PAX6, SOX2, and Nestin (Ciani et al.,2024).

Positioned primarily in superficial cortical Layer I, their cell bodies anchor near the pia mater surface. Rather than breaking down, their developmental lineage appears to capture a "frozen frame" of the embryonic radial state, repurposing the radial scaffolding concept from a transient developmental highway into a permanent, lifelong structural and signaling axis.

Building upon this ontogenetic continuity, we hypothesize the existence of an extreme morphological subset: pan-neocortical interlaminar astrocytes (pILAs).

While standard ILAs project tortuous, unbranched fibers through supragranular layers (layers II–IV) spanning distances of roughly one millimeter, we theorize that a specialized subpopulation of human ILAs extends its processes across the entirety of the cortical column, reaching deep into layers V and VI.

• Structural and Functional Implications: In a massively expanded human cortex, the distance between superficial modulatory inputs (originating from the pial/CSF environment, meninges, and superficial projections) and deep output layers (which project to subcortical and spinal targets) is immense. A translaminar ILA possessing ultra-long processes would act as a direct radial conduit.
• Bridging the Column: Such a cell would physically and biochemically couple superficial cortical processing with deep-layer motor/subcortical outputs. By mirroring the upward projections of deep-layer astrocytes with long processes , these extreme ILAs would establish a bidirectional, whole-column glial channel that preserves the geometry of Rakic's original radial unit.

These hypothetical pILAs must be contextualized in the neocortical information processing. It relies heavily on a dual-scale astrocytic network that facilitates both local micro-domain computation and long-range radial integration across cortical layers. Protoplasmic astrocytes, densely packed from layers II through VI, form vertically stacked micro-domains that manage local synaptic environments, neurotransmitter clearance, and ion homeostasis within individual cortical columns. In contrast, higher primates have evolved interlaminar astrocytes (ILAs), which provide a specialized macro-scale architectural conduit for vertical communication (Reisin et al.,2002). With cell bodies rooted in layer I, a primary hub for top-down feedback and neuromodulatory inputs, ILAs project remarkably long, unbranched and branched processes downward through the cortical laminae. Rather than relying solely on sequential, local cell-to-cell signaling, these radial processes physically and physiologically bridge superficial regulatory networks with deeper, granular processing layers. This dual framework suggests that while protoplasmic stacking fine-tunes sequential, layer-specific computations, interlaminar astrocytes offer a structural substrate for rapid radial synchronization, supporting the complex associative processing and executive functions characteristic of the primate brain.

In a massively expanded human neocortex, information processing requires rapid coordination between superficial associative layers (layers II–III, which handle intra-cortical communication) and deep output layers (layers V–VI, which dispatch commands to subcortical and spinal targets).

• The Superficial Anchor: Megatranslaminar ILAs provide a top-down conduit, tethering the pial/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) interface and superficial signaling molecules down to the infragranular layers.
• The Deep-Layer Counterpart: Conversely, deep-layer neocortical astrocytes with projections occupy layers V and VI. As recent evidence highlights (e.g., Falcone et al., 2026), specialized long-process or varicose states in these deep layers often emerge as dynamic, reactive responses to local microenvironmental stress or neuroinflammatory gradients.

How might these two populations interact within the same cortical column? We propose a dual mechanism of metabolic and neurochemical coupling:

• Gap Junctional Syncytium and Ion Buffering: Astrocytes form massive, interconnected networks via gap junctions (predominantly connexins Cx43 and Cx30). If a mega-translaminar ILA physically contacts deep-layer projection astrocytes, it could create a direct high-speed corridor for potassium spatial buffering and lactate shuttling, bypassing the dense local web of standard protoplasmic astrocytes. This would allow rapid energy mobilization from superficial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sources directly to the metabolically demanding, firing-heavy pyramidal neurons of layers V and VI.

 Given that deep-layer projection phenotypes can be triggered by stress or cytokine signaling, a physical or functional bridge between Layer I ILAs and deep-layer astrocytes could serve an early-warning signaling role. Superficial layers are the first to encounter CSF-borne immune signals or metabolic shifts; a continuous glial projection network could rapidly relay neuroprotective or reactive signals up and down the cortical column.

  If interlaminar astrocytes (ILAs) act as the permanent developmental "ghosts" of Rakic's radial scaffolding (2005), guiding or maintaining the columnar architecture, any subtle genetic or neurodevelopmental error during their specification could misalign the entire vertical communication grid. If the top-down pial signals fail to sync properly with deep-layer projection systems, the brain’s delicate balance of filtering sensory information (a core deficit in schizophrenia) could collapse. Schizophrenia, for example,  is widely viewed as a disorder of disconnectivity, particularly involving abnormalities in how higher-order prefrontal regions coordinate with deeper brain structures, and features pronounced changes in astrocytic networking.

There is a trade-off  for this very complex cognitive structure: the very cellular adaptations that made human abstract thought, complex language, and expansive neocortical columns possible (like ILAs and extended glial axes) also act as unique Achilles' heels. Because these complex astroglial networks are uniquely elaborated in humans, they may predispose us to uniquely human neuropsychiatric conditions that simpler mammalian brains do not experience to the same degree.

In particular, the kindling effect (Barnes et al.,2003) represents the dark side of human neocortical plasticity, a process tightly regulated by protoplasmic astrocytes. These gray-matter cells are exceptionally large and complex in humans, enveloping up to two million synapses to manage glutamate clearance and maintain synaptic homeostasis. Under chronic stress or repeated affective episodes, protoplasmic astrocytes fail to efficiently reabsorb excess glutamate, causing excitotoxicity and lowering the neuronal activation threshold. This failure is compounded by glia hysteresis, a phenomenon where these specific astrocytes retain a molecular "memory" of past stress, locking the neocortex into a persistent, hyper-reactive state long after the stressor has ceased. Consequently, what evolved as an adaptive mechanism for rapid environmental learning becomes a pathological feedback loop, where future clinical episodes are triggered spontaneously or by increasingly minor events.

Transport for the Neocortical Metropolis: a functional metaphor

Reconceptualizing the human neocortex requires viewing it less as a monolithic computer and more as a decentralized, multi-tiered metropolis inspired by Marvin Minsky’s Society of Mind (1986), where complex cognition emerges from the cooperation of specialized, non-intelligent agents. In this urban layout, neurons and glia operate as fundamentally distinct transportation systems: neurons act as the high-speed electric rail network that is fast, precise, and wired for point-to-point electrical transmission while astroglia form the chemical logistics, fluid-delivery, and local-delivery infrastructure. Therefore, the human neocortex can be interpreted as a multi-modal transit grid with a neuro-glial division of labor.

As said before, for Minsky, the mind emerges from the interaction of a "society" of individual, non-intelligent agents (small local processes/modules), the addition of the astrocytic network transforms this model into something even more modern, dynamic, and integrated. In Minsky's original model, "society" is composed almost exclusively of cognitive agents (neurons or functional modules) that exchange messages. It's like describing a city by speaking only of its inhabitants and their conversations.

The inclusion of deep glia integrates the environment and the resource:

• Agents (Neurons/Columns): They solve specific subproblems (Minsky's "stations" or individual "agents").

• Environmental Managers (Astrocytes): They decide which agent has the resources (energy, glucose, blood flow) to function at any given time. A neuronal "agent" cannot function unless the underlying astrocytic network opens the metabolic valves.

Minsky hypothesized the existence of "control agents" (called B-brains or higher-level agents) that observe and modify the actions of lower-level agents. In psychobiology, astrocytes and their horizontal network in Layer VI do exactly this, but through a different language:

• Neurons communicate at very high frequencies (milliseconds) via discrete electrical impulses (Binary/Digital Code).

• The astrocytic network communicates at low frequencies (seconds, minutes and , in some cases, hours) via calcium (Ca2+) waves that travel along the horizontal extensions (Analog/Holistic Code).

This slow flow along the "subway" of Layer VI coordinates entire regions of columns, tuning the readiness of the "society" of neurons. This is the true metabolic and modulatory metacognition of the cortex.

One of the classic criticisms of purely computational models of the mind (such as those of Minsky's symbolic Artificial Intelligence) is that they ignore thermodynamic and energetic constraints.

The biological-style Society of Mind is not an abstract network:

• Each "agency" (column) competes for resources.

• The horizontal and vertical extensions of astrocytes function as an invisible hand of the brain's economy. They release neuromodulators and lactate only to active "agencies," shutting down unused ones.

In summary, The "Society of Mind" 2.0 is multipartite, including the interactions between neurons and the various types of glia, in particular, the various populations of astroglia. If Minsky described the democracy of neuronal agents, astrocytic psychobiology shows us that this democracy can only function thanks to a dense infrastructural glial network.

To conceptualize this architecture, the neocortex can be envisioned as a vast metropolis composed of macro-columnar 'skyscrapers.' Within each column, specialized human interlaminar astrocytes (ILAs) function as high-speed vertical elevators, linking the subpial roof (Glia Limitans Superficialis) directly to deep-layer output tiers without relying on multi-stop neuronal relays. Complementing these vertical shafts are the underground express lines running along the deep layer boundary (Layers V/VI), where projection astrocytes  interface with long-range white matter tracts. While local protoplasmic astrocytes manage block-by-block neighborhood traffic within specific floors, the synergistic interaction between vertical elevators and subterranean express lines enables the human brain to rapidly integrate local top-down oversight with distant, city-wide network execution.

Within this metropolitan grid, a distinct vertical and local axis spans from the administrative penthouse down to the neighborhood streets:

·         The Metacognitive Control Room (Layer I): Functioning like a central transport authority monitoring a city's entire network, Layer I acts as a metacognitive tier. Here, the glia limitans and the somas of interlaminar astrocytes (ILAs) act as specialized operators that monitor the cerebrospinal fluid and global signals, overseeing the health and status of the infrastructure.

·         The Elevetor Lines (ILAs): Just as transit supervisors dispatch signals across a city,ILAs, including our hypothetical pan-neocortical ILAs, serve as chemical express lines. Dropping ultra-long processes all the way down from Layer I to the deep infragranular layers, they bypass traditional, slow multi-synaptic neuronal delays. They provide the high-speed, translaminar vertical transit system. Instead of waiting for the slow, multi-stop local neuronal relay (staircase), signals, ions, and modulatory influences can be broadcast vertically across the "floors" via these long ILA tracks.

 

·         The Local Delivery Networks (Protoplasmic Astrocytes): Filling the spaces between the high-speed neuronal rails throughout layers II through V are the bush-like protoplasmic astrocytes. Operating like local neighborhood distribution hubs and delivery vans, these cells maintain strict territorial domains. They manage local chemical traffic by clearing neurotransmitters (like glutamate), buffering potassium ions, and shuttling energetic metabolites directly to active synapses. Unlike the elevators that span multiple floors, protoplasmic astrocytes are strictly localized. They act as the individual floor managers or maintenance crews, taking care of the local synaptic microenvironments, clearing neurotransmitters, and managing energy supplies within their specific tier.

·         The Ground-Floor Industrial Hub (Deep-Layer Projection Astrocytes): Reaching the base of the cortex in layers V and VI, these specialized long-process astrocytes manage the heavy industrial output, coordinating the metabolic demands of deep projection neurons.  Subterranean-underground express lines are the representation of the  deep-layer projection astrocytes network.

Running vertically through this entire architecture is a proposed translaminar astroglial axis. Driven by gap-junction-coupled networks (Cx30 and Cx43) and hypothesized physical continuities between superficial ILAs and deep projection astrocytes (former varicose projection astrocytes), this axis provides a rapid metabolic and ionic pipeline. It allows the human neocortex to bypass purely neuronal relay delays, instantly coupling global superficial states (from the GLS and Layer I) with deep-layer motor execution (Layer V) and thalamic filtering (Layer VI).

While neuronal tracks handle fast electrical signaling, this chemical transit network, running from the Layer I control room, down the  pan-neocortical translaminar express lines, and out through the local protoplasmic delivery web, allows the brain to manage whole-column logistics. However, its immense sophistication introduces systemic vulnerability. If the control room fails to monitor the network, or if local protoplasmic and deep-layer hubs experience stress-induced reactive states, the coordination between high-level metacognitive oversight and ground-floor operations collapses, offering a compelling glial framework for understanding uniquely human psychopathology.

 

The central, vertical place of glia in Cognitive Science

The Cognitive Hexagon is a famous diagram introduced in 1978  as originally depicted in the A. P. Sloan Foundation Report (1978, as cited in Gardner, 1985) . It was created to map out and officially define cognitive science as a brand-new, interdisciplinary field of study dedicated to understanding the human mind, intelligence, and information processing.

The model is shaped like a regular hexagon, with six distinct academic disciplines sitting at its vertices:

• Philosophy: Explores foundational questions about the nature of knowledge, reasoning, and consciousness.
• Psychology: Focuses on human behavior, mental processes, perception, and memory.
• Linguistics: Analyzes the structure, acquisition, and use of language.
• Neuroscience: Investigates the physical and biological structures of the brain and nervous system.
• Artificial Intelligence (AI): Builds computational models to simulate mental processes using machines.
• Anthropology: Examines human societies, cultural evolution, and how culture shapes cognitive habits.

 

We think that glia studies must have a central role in the cognitive exagon without adding new vertices to it.  The original 1978 model was tightly bound by a shared commitment to computationalism and representationalism (the idea that the mind processes information like a computer). Adding fields that do not neatly fit this paradigm risks turning the hexagon into a vague "catch-all" for anything related to human behavior. Following the human-specific morphology and functions of glia cells, in particular the vertical development of interlaminar astroglial cells theory, it is proposed a pyramid with exagonal base scheme where a possible gliascience: the discipline devoted to the study of glia cells is included (Spadaro,2015;2016). 

Legend:

A:Philosophy; B:Psychology; C:Linguistics; D:Neuroscience; E:Artificial Intelligence; F:Anthropology; G: Gliascience. 

Following the functional metaphor of the infrastructure with various floors, it has been developed also the scheme below:

1. The Roof: Glia Limitans Superficialis (GLS)

• Anatomical Role: The subpial astrocytic boundary separating the neural parenchyma from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and meninges.
• Cognitive/Functional Role: Acts as the ultimate supraboundary regulator. It senses CSF-derived chemical signals, manages the glymphatic-interstitial fluid exchange, and acts as the entry point for global homeostatic and modulatory influences on human thought.

2. Layer-Floor  I: Meta-Cognitive Tier

• Cellular Players: Interlaminar astrocytes (ILAs) and apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons.
• Cognitive/Functional Role: Top-down modulation, attentional control, and the monitoring of thought. ILAs anchor near the GLS and deploy long processes that initiate the vertical broadcasting of signals down through the cortex.

3. Layers-Floors II & III: Mesocognitive Tier

• Cellular Players: Protoplasmic astrocytes and supragranular pyramidal neurons.
• Cognitive/Functional Role: Horizontal integration, conceptual association, and cortico-cortical communication across different columns and hemispheres.

4. Layer-Floor IV: Proto-Cognitive Tier

• Cellular Players: Protoplasmic astrocytes and granular/pyramidal neurons.
• Cognitive/Functional Role: Raw sensory input reception from the thalamus (hyper-proto for input saturation; ipo-proto for input deficit).

5. Layer-floor V: Praxi-Cognitive Tier

• Cellular Players: Deep-layer astrocytes with long processes (the so-called varicose projection astrocytes, see Falcone et. al.,2026) and large pyramidal output neurons.
• Cognitive/Functional Role: Translation of thinking into action and inhibitory control (hyper-praxi for rigidity/block; ipo-praxi for impulsivity).

6. Layer-Floor VI: Retro-Cognitive Tier

• Cellular Players: Deep projection astrocytes and multiform/pyramidal neurons.
• Cognitive/Functional Role: Feedback loops directed back toward the thalamus for filtering, gating, and selecting incoming information.

A critical structural question in modeling a continuous translaminar glial axis is why deep-layer astroglial processes (such as those in the praxi-cognitive Layer V and retro-cognitive Layer VI) do not simply drift or project indiscriminately into the underlying white matter. The answer likely lies in the biophysical mechanics of durotaxis: the directed movement or process extension of cells governed by stiffness gradients in the extracellular matrix (Weissenbruch et al.,2025).

·         Stiffness Discrepancies: The neocortical gray matter (housing the cellular machinery of layers I through VI) and the subcortical white matter (dominated by dense, myelinated axon tracts) present vastly different mechanical microenvironments. White matter tracts, packed with tightly bundled lipid-rich myelin and parallel axonal arrays, exhibit distinct viscoelastic and mechanical rigidity properties compared to the neuron- and synapse-dense neuropil of the gray matter.

·         Stiffness-Gated Process Extension: Astrocytes are known to be highly mechano-sensitive cells that use durotaxis to sample and respond to substrate rigidity. The sharp biochemical and biophysical transition at the boundary between deep layer VI and the white matter acts as a mechanical "speed bump" or natural barrier.

·         Preserving Functional Compartmentalization: Rather than letting deep-layer projection astrocytes bleed random processes into white matter tracks, durotactic cues help anchor these cells within the cortical sheet. This ensures that deep-layer astrocytic processes remain tightly aligned with deep pyramidal neurons and local microvessels, maintaining the integrity of the praxi-cognitive and retro-cognitive tiers without losing their polarization to the structural tracts below.

A compelling implication of our theoretical pan-neocortical interlaminar astrocytes, those originating in pial Layer I and sending ultra-long processes all the way down to the base of the neocortex, is the establishment of a direct, bi-directional glial communication axis across the entire cortical column. This architecture sets the stage for a unique cellular dialogue between superficial lineages and deep-layer neocortical astrocytes with projections.

Within the human neocortex, complex neuro-glial interactions provide the structural and metabolic architecture that underpins multi-tiered cognitive processing across distinct cortical columns. In the meta-cognitive Layer I, primate-specific interlaminar astrocytes deploy two to three long, tortuous processes that project vertically over millimeters, independent of local boundaries, down into the mesocognitive (Layers II–III) and proto-cognitive (Layer IV) tiers. These specialized processes act as structural conduits for vertical broadcasting, physically coupling superficial top-down regulatory signals directly to the underlying modular columns. Across all layers, protoplasmic astrocytes and deep-layer astrocytes with long processes form expansive syncytia interconnected by connexin-based (Rash et al.,2001) gap junctions (Cx30 and Cx43). These gap junction networks facilitate the intercellular sharing of ions (K+), metabolites, and second messengers, locally coordinating the synaptic microenvironments of pyramidal neurons. Specifically, in the deep praxi-cognitive (Layer V) and retro-cognitive (Layer VI) zones, projection astrocytes integrate with deep pyramidal arborizations and the local microvasculature. By synchronizing metabolic supply with electrical activity via gap junctions, these glial networks dynamically modulate both the execution of thought into action and the precise thalamic feedback loops required for cognitive coherence.

The proposed existence of a continuous, radially oriented translaminar astroglial axis unique to the human neocortex must be included in this multi-level cognitive model. Specialized primate-specific pan-neocortical interlaminar astrocytes (pILAs) originating in the meta-cognitive Layer I extend exceptionally long, primary processes that traverse the mesocognitive (Layers II–III) and proto-cognitive (Layer IV) tiers, ultimately projecting deep into the praxi-cognitive (Layer V) and retro-cognitive (Layer VI) zones. Here, these descending pILA fibers structurally and functionally interface with deep-layer astrocytes with long processes (the so-called varicose projection astrocytes, see Falcone et al.,2026) via extensive gap junction networks (Cx30 and Cx43).

This structural continuity bridges the entire functional hierarchy of the neocortex:

• Top-Down Coordination (Layer I & II–III): ILAs receive and integrate global modulatory signals, using their vertical tracks to broadcast attentional states downward across horizontal mesocognitive associative networks.
• Input-Output Coupling (Layer IV to V–VI): By physically bridging the proto-cognitive sensory reception layer with the praxi-cognitive (action execution) and retro-cognitive (thalamic feedback) layers, this glial axis provides a metabolic and ionic pipeline.
• Dynamic Synchronization: This translaminar network allows the brain to rapidly couple high-level thought monitoring with motor translation and precise thalamic filtering, bypassing the delays of purely neuronal relay steps.

This glial architecture suggests that human cognitive complexity relies not only on expanded neuronal circuitry, but on a specialized astroglial scaffolding capable of coordinating macro-columnar processing from surface to deep output layers.

 

Conclusion

By reframing the human neocortex through a six-tiered functional hierarchy, anchored by the supraboundary glia limitans superficialis, mediated vertically by interlaminar astroglial 'elevators,' and modulated horizontally by mesocognitive protoplasmic networks, this framework challenges deeply entrenched neurocentric paradigms. We propose the translaminar astroglial axis not as an established anatomical dogma, but as an explicit, testable model of macro-columnar coordination. In strict adherence to Popperian principles of falsification (1959), we invite the scientific community to test, challenge, and verify or falsify this hypothesis. Advanced high-resolution structural tracing, 3D electron microscopy, and mechano-biophysical analyses of durotaxis at the gray-white matter boundary will ultimately determine whether astroglia truly serve as the master architects of human cognitive architecture.

 

References

Barnes, S. J., Pinel, J. P., Wig, G. S., Stuettgen, M. C., & Hölzel, C. H. (2003). Stimulation site determines the conditioned effects of kindling in rats: Anterior neocortex versus amygdala. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17(8), 1671-1679.

Cinquina, V., Tretiakov, E. O., Kalaba, P., Alpár, A., Calvigioni, D., Piscitelli, F., ... & Harkany, T. (2025). Astrocytes modulate neuronal development by S100A6 signaling. Nature Communications, 16(1), 9049.

Ciani, C., Ayub, M., & Falcone, C. (2024). Evolution of astrocyte-neuron interactions across species. Astrocyte-Neuron Interactions in Health and Disease, 1-17.

Colombo, J. A., & Reisin, H. D. (2004). Interlaminar astroglia of the cerebral cortex: a marker of the primate brain. Brain research, 1006(1), 126-131.

Colombo, J. A. (2017). The interlaminar glia: from serendipity to hypothesis. Brain Structure and Function, 222(3), 1109-1129.

Falcone, C., Penna, E., Hong, T., Tarantal, A. F., Hof, P. R., Hopkins, W. D., ... & Martínez-Cerdeño, V. (2021). Cortical interlaminar astrocytes are generated prenatally, mature postnatally, and express unique markers in human and nonhuman primates. Cerebral Cortex, 31(1), 379-395.

Ciani, C., Pistorio, G., Giancola, S., Mearelli, M., Mongelli, F. E., Forouzeh, D., ... & Falcone, C. (2026). Varicose projection astrocytes: Conserved reactive cells in brain pathology. Science Advances, 12(29), eady8204.

Fields, R. D., & Burnstock, G. (2006). Purinergic signalling in neuron–glia interactions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6), 423-436.

Fourrier, C., Singhal, G., & Baune, B. T. (2019). Neuroinflammation and cognition across psychiatric conditions. CNS spectrums, 24(1), 4-15.

Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. Basic Books.

Krencik, R., van Asperen, J. V., & Ullian, E. M. (2017). Human astrocytes are distinct contributors to the complexity of synaptic function. Brain research bulletin, 129, 66-73.

Minsky,M.L. (1986). The society of mind. Simon & Schuster.

Munger, E. L., Edler, M. K., Hopkins, W. D., Hof, P. R., Sherwood, C. C., & Raghanti, M. A. (2022). Comparative analysis of astrocytes in the prefrontal cortex of primates: insights into the evolution of human brain energetics. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 530(18), 3106-3125.

Jones, O. D., Sateesh, S., & Abraham, W. C. (2024). Metaplasticity and Synaptic Tag and Capture: Differential Dynamics of Plasticity Regulation in the Hippocampus. Synaptic Tagging and Capture: From Synapses to Behavior, 77-97.

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson & Co.

Santello, M., Toni, N., & Volterra, A. (2019). Astrocyte function from information processing to cognition and cognitive impairment. Nature neuroscience, 22(2), 154-166.

Matyash, V., & Kettenmann, H. (2010). Heterogeneity in astrocyte morphology and physiology. Brain research reviews, 63(1-2), 2-10.

Morris, G. P., Clark, I. A., Zinn, R., & Vissel, B. (2013). Microglia: a new frontier for synaptic plasticity, learning and memory, and neurodegenerative disease research. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 105, 40-53.

Mosti, F., Kawasaki, H., Babbit, C., di Benedetto, B., Silver, D. L., Kalebic, N., & Falcone, C. (2025). Shaping the neocortex: Radial Glia and astrocytes in development and evolution. The Journal of Neuroscience, 45(46), e1301252025.

Munger, E. L., Edler, M. K., Hopkins, W. D., Hof, P. R., Sherwood, C. C., & Raghanti, M. A. (2022). Comparative analysis of astrocytes in the prefrontal cortex of primates: insights into the evolution of human brain energetics. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 530(18), 3106-3125.

Rakic, P. (1978). Neuronal migration and contact guidance in the primate telencephalon. Postgraduate medical journal, 54, 25-40.

Rakic, P. (1981). Neuronal-glial interaction during brain development. Trends in Neurosciences, 4, 184-187.

Rakic, P. (2005). 31 Radial glial cells: scaffolding for cortical development and evolution. Neuroglia, 389-404.

Rash, J. E., Yasumura, T., Dudek, F. E., & Nagy, J. I. (2001). Cell-specific expression of connexins and evidence of restricted gap junctional coupling between glial cells and between neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(6), 1983-2000.

Reisin, H. D., & Colombo, J. A. (2002). Considerations on the astroglial architecture and the columnar organization of the cerebral cortex. Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 22(5), 633-644.

Semyanov, A., Henneberger, C., & Agarwal, A. (2020). Making sense of astrocytic calcium signals—from acquisition to interpretation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(10), 551-564.

Spadaro, S. (2015). Towards a Cognitive Gliascience: A Brief Conceptual Framework. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 8(6), 1-11.

Spadaro, S. (2016). Studying the Cognitive Involvement of Glia Using Stochastic Functional Microscopy. British Biotechnology Journal, 13(2), 1-6.

Stogsdill, J. A., Harwell, C. C., & Goldman, S. A. (2023). Astrocytes as master modulators of neural networks: Synaptic functions and disease‐associated dysfunction of astrocytes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1525(1), 41-60.

Weißenbruch, K., & Mayor, R. (2025). Neural crest migration orchestrated by molecular and mechanical signals. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 41(1), 159-185.

Tyurikova, O. (2024). Morphological and physiological features of human cerebral cortical astrocytes in regenerative medicine: a narrative review. Regenerative Medicine Reports, 1(1), 52-58.

Volterra, A., Liaudet, N., & Savtchouk, I. (2014). Astrocyte Ca2+ signalling: an unexpected complexity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(5), 327-335.